The federal Liberals have recently gained control of parliamentary committees and have promptly opted to conduct some proceedings in closed-door sessions. Liberal members have requested to go in camera for government business at four committees: ethics, health, science, and transport. This move has prevented opposition MPs from publicly discussing the discussions held behind closed doors. The Conservatives have criticized this decision, labeling it as undemocratic.
At the veterans affairs committee, Liberal members voted on main estimates and then unilaterally adjourned the meeting, effectively halting further debate on a Conservative motion regarding the impact of the 2025 budget on veterans. Despite objections from Conservatives, the chair proceeded with the decision.
In another instance, the science and research committee moved in camera following a Liberal request to proceed with “drafting instructions” on a study, which is typically conducted in closed sessions. The Conservatives were aiming to discuss a motion concerning a $200-million federal agreement related to Spaceport Nova Scotia and its implications for Canada’s space sector.
Similarly, the ethics committee and the transport committee also went in camera after specific motions were raised. The health committee’s discussion about the PrescribeIT program was also shifted to a closed-door session following talks about probing the $300-million initiative, which aimed to modernize doctors’ offices.
While the Liberals have solidified their majority in parliament and restructured committees to favor the governing party, Government House leader Steven MacKinnon has refuted claims of weaponizing in camera sessions. MacKinnon emphasized that committees have the right to discuss confidential and contractual matters behind closed doors. He defended the move, stating that the committee process has been functioning smoothly and all parties are cooperating effectively.